Rachel Maddow – auditions for anti-gay marriage commercial

by on September 1, 2010


The Human Rights Campaign posted footage of actors auditioning for an anti-gay commercial commissioned by the National Organization for Marriage.

    { 25 comments… read them below or add one }

    CyborgNinja7 September 1, 2010 at 2:36 pm

    @Internetizen02 Marriage is a union, and has nothing to do with property in this day and age. I’m tired of the same rehash of “marriage is all about sharing women as property” crap. I’m liberal, but I don’t believe everything a few idiots say.

    agoodgirlNOT September 1, 2010 at 2:57 pm

    @pakleglia its not about the marriage. its about the benefits.

    painsey September 1, 2010 at 3:03 pm

    haha fucking powned

    pakleglia September 1, 2010 at 3:40 pm

    Why do people, Gay or Straight give a shit about getting married anyway?
    Marriage sucks.

    wolfmother8719 September 1, 2010 at 3:46 pm

    dies laughing

    asiluk3 September 1, 2010 at 4:08 pm

    hahahahaa!!!! love this!

    ThoseWhoScream September 1, 2010 at 5:08 pm

    lol ok ok im not even gonna take this comercial serious or affended its just so funny 2M4M should be anti gay they shuld be comedians seriously

    kakairuislove September 1, 2010 at 5:47 pm

    Well i thought in marrige only devotion and love mattered not gender and why would us homosexuals corrupt marrige we don’t want to corrupt or cause problems we just want are right oh and one more thing gay marrige will soon be legal all over america and in 30 years or so all over the world there are millions of good people fighting for this it will happen

    MlleRoxie85 September 1, 2010 at 6:14 pm

    hahaa, at least they could only afford third class actors!

    OrmEmber September 1, 2010 at 6:31 pm

    Actors, actors, actors…. Yes, I’m talking to YOU….
    show some more respect for yourself than this. I know we all need work (God knows I do), but I would not do such a thing even if I were going to be out on the street.
    Imagine if you got to be famous someday, how much this would come back to haunt you? Worse than appearing in soft porn (which I actually would do……)

    stryfan7 September 1, 2010 at 6:58 pm

    That video was sooo fake. Lies, lies, lies and made up rehearsals, that’s how low these people will go to distract people from the facts. The anti-marriage people will do anything to take over America.

    gossieuk September 1, 2010 at 7:09 pm

    homophobes can’t read

    gossieuk September 1, 2010 at 7:38 pm

    Have any of these anti-gay people come up with an adequate response to any variant of the question ‘how exactly the fuck would gay marriage affect you?’

    CENSOREDFORSEX September 1, 2010 at 7:41 pm

    No, you are wrong it is just a contract according to the law. According to your retarded religion it is some sacred nonsense. Don’t let your relationship with your imaginary friend effect how you treat people who are different than you.

    VintageGinger September 1, 2010 at 8:08 pm

    is it just me or does the 1st adutioner look gay :)

    Wolfbloodvamps171 September 1, 2010 at 8:41 pm

    And I am afraid!? The the F does anyone have to afraid of gay marriage for? It is a civil right what is it going to take to get it through those enormous bigotry heads people have?

    Internetizen02 September 1, 2010 at 9:33 pm

    Addendum to previous response: Your statements are either demonstrably false as “legally marriage cannot be between” homosexuals as demonstrated by the fact that it is legal in some places or logically false (falacy) by your question begging by asserting that it is a “distortion” when you are assuming hetero-marriages to begin with. At base, marriage is contract. Love is not requisite. If two people (assume hetero for your sake) wish to marry for financial reasons, then they have that right.

    Internetizen02 September 1, 2010 at 9:39 pm

    Legally, it can be anything legislators make it. Ethically, it only requires two consenting adults of any gender. It is legal in several American states, Massachusetts being the first, and of course it has been legal in some more enlightened countries even longer

    “Sacred relationship of devotion and love” is not limited to heterosexsuals. Those traits can be had by any consenting adult for any other consenting adult who shares them, gender of the parties is irrelevant.

    pig5689 September 1, 2010 at 10:27 pm

    Hey “IntermessizenToo” -

    No, legally marriage cannot be between a homosexer woman & another homosexer woman or a homosexer man & another homosexer man. Never has been, never will be. Marriage isn’t just a “contract”. It’s a sacred relationship of devotion & love between a man & a woman. That’s it. Any attempt by homosexers to distort & corrupt this blessing of marriage is an unnatural & immoral abomination, an offense to those who have committed themselves to the sanctity of marriage.

    Internetizen02 September 1, 2010 at 11:01 pm

    True marriage can be between a man and a woman or between a woman and a woman or between a man and a man.

    Marriage is about property and is a contract. As the right to property is inalienable, no one has the right to tell one consenting adult that they can’t share their property rights to their property with another consenting adult by contract, and that is entitled to legal recognition without prejudice.

    TexasRangers34 September 1, 2010 at 11:10 pm

    Truth hurts, eh?

    biometricsislavery September 1, 2010 at 11:25 pm

    Google “Communist Goals 1963 Congressional Record”

    COMMUNIST GOAL # 26 Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as “normal, natural, healthy.”

    COMMUNIST GOAL #40 40. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce.

    IvanSorath September 1, 2010 at 11:52 pm

    hat mama

    JamisonCentre September 2, 2010 at 12:38 am

    Next time post your name and address you big brave man.

    TexasRangers34 September 2, 2010 at 1:01 am

    Maddow is nothing but a stuff-jawed cow. Does she ever open her mouth more than 1/4 of an inch? Maybe only when muffin munching.

    Leave a Comment

    Previous post:

    Next post: